- Respondents in the youngest (<35) and oldest (75+) age groups and living in PO5 are least likely to think something is missing from the policies for objective 1
- Residents in PO1-PO3, those living outside Portsmouth and those with a disability are most likely to think something is missing (7%-8%)
- In terms of those that think something is missing from policies A to C, the lack of focus on residents’ parking needs is the most mentioned theme (36%)
- 14% think that not enough thought has gone into improving public transport and that it is not suitable for everyone to use
- 10% express concerns about the provision of sufficient additional parking at new developments such as the Bransbury leisure centre or the John Pounds centre
Missing from the objective 1 (policies A to C)
Summary
Who thinks something is missing from objective 1 (policies A to C)
Base: (top to bottom) | Total sample: 1,494 | Age: 108, 152, 216, 286, 247, 91 | Sex: 563, 507 | Postcode: 114, 266, 131, 311, 159, 124, 58 | Disability: 230, 817
This chart shows the proportion of respondents who think something is missing from objective 1 (policies A to C):
5% of the total sample.
2% of those aged under 34,
3% of those aged 35-44,
6% of those aged 45-54,
6% of those aged 55-64,
5% of those aged 65-74, and
3% of those aged 75 and over.
4% of males and
5% of females.
8% of those in PO1,
7% of those in PO2,
7% of those in PO3,
4% of those in PO4,
3% of those in PO5,
4% of those in PO6 and
7% of those living external to PO1-PO6.
7% of those with a disability and
4% of those without a disability.
What do you think is missing from policies A to C?
Base: Respondents who think something is missing (69)
| wdt_ID | Key themes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parking for residents should be the focus e.g. on residential streets, at the seafront, houses with multiple vehicles being restricted, remove commercial vehicles left long-term or taking residential spaces after daily restrictions end | 36 |
| 2 | Public transport not good enough / not suitable for all e.g. for disabled, south to north journeys, P&R poorly sited | 14 |
| 3 | Concerned there won't be enough car parking or free car parking e.g. at new facilities such as Bransbury leisure centre, John Pounds centre | 10 |
| 4 | Policies lack ambition / too vague | 7 |
| 5 | Strategy needs to be more joined up | 6 |
| 6 | Electric scooters should not be encouraged or increased | 3 |
| 7 | Other e.g. stop school children travelling to and from school by car, just too many cars, some people have to use a car for their job, more blue badge spaces | 19 |
| 8 | No relevant comment / no comment | 13 |
