Search
Generic filters

Facilitate economic activity through tailored parking solutions for short and medium-term parking needs

Summary

  • Again, it is respondents aged 45-54, males and those living outside the city boundary (PO1-PO6) who show the highest levels of disagreement, this time for policy C (facilitate economic activity through tailored parking solutions for short and medium-term parking needs)
  • Almost a quarter of respondents (23%) who disagree with policy C think that it is a money-making scheme for the council that will put visitors off
  • 16% feel that the policy is vague and confused, and doesn’t provide enough detail for them to make an informed decision either way
  • 13% feel that residents are not being prioritised enough
  • 9% feel that the policy encourages car use and doesn’t do enough to encourage a switch to sustainable transport

Who disagrees with policy C?

Base: (top to bottom) | Total sample: 1,494 | Age: 108, 152, 216, 286, 247, 91 | Sex: 563, 507 | Postcode: 114, 266, 131, 311, 159, 124, 58 | Disability: 230, 817

This chart shows the proportion of respondents who disagree with policy C (Facilitate economic activity through tailored parking solutions for short and medium-term parking needs):
6% of the total sample.
6% of those aged under 34,
7% of those aged 35-44,
9% of those aged 45-54,
7% of those aged 55-64,
3% of those aged 65-74, and
1% of those aged 75 and over.
8% of males and 3% of females.
7% of those in PO1,
8% of those in PO2,
8% of those in PO3,
7% of those in PO4,
4% of those in PO5,
3% of those in PO6 and
9% of those living external to PO1-PO6.
7% of those with a disability and 6% of those without a disability.

Why do you disagree with policy C?

Base: Respondents who disagree with policy C (91)
wdt_ID Key themes Percentage (%)
1 Money-making scheme / will put off visitors 23
2 Vague / confused / not enough detail 16
3 Doesn't benefit residents 13
4 Encourages car use and discourages switch to sustainable transport 9
5 Waste of money / won't work 7
6 Not needed / already available 7
7 Anti-motorist / restrictive 4
8 No space to build new car parks 2
9 Other e.g. no mention of disabled parking, police disabled spaces better, will end up only going to places where you know you can park 10
10 No relevant comment / no comment 22