Supporting the proposed changes

• All proposed changes are either ‘strongly’ or ‘somewhat’ supported by the majority of respondents and levels of opposition are low across the board
• ‘Creating additional space for pedestrians and installing CCTV lighting along Sydenham Terrace’, along with ‘making the road closure on Canal Walk permanent’, received the highest support from respondents, with over half of respondents strongly supporting these proposed changes

Base: Total sample (top to bottom):  535 | 537 | 537 | 539 | 535

This chart shows how much respondents support each of the proposed changes:Creating additional space for pedestrians and installing CCTV and more lighting along Sydenham Terrace: 53% said they strongly support, 25% said they somewhat support, 17% said they neither support nor oppose, 2% said they somewhat oppose, and 2% said they strongly oppose. Making the road closure on Canal Walk permanent: 52% said they strongly support, 17% said they somewhat support, 21% said they neither support nor oppose, 4% said they somewhat oppose, and 6% said they strongly oppose.
Adding a bi-directional cycle track along Sydenham Terrace: 48% said they strongly support, 29% said they somewhat support, 17% said they neither support nor oppose, 2% said they somewhat oppose, and 5% said they strongly oppose. Updating the crossing at Victoria Road North to be a traffic light crossing: 46% said they strongly support, 26% said they somewhat support, 18% said they neither support nor oppose, 5% said they somewhat oppose, and 4% said they strongly oppose. Improving crossings along Canal Walk at junctions with Bridgeside Close, Milford Road and Railway View: 44% said they strongly support, 27% said they somewhat support, 25% said they neither support nor oppose, 1% said they somewhat oppose, and 3% said they strongly oppose

Base: Total sample (top to bottom): 518 | 520 | 520 | 521 | 518 | 536

This chart shows how much respondents support each of the proposed changes (continued):Improving pedestrian crossing at Carlisle Road junction with Somers Road: 41% said they strongly support, 31% said they somewhat support, 24% said they neither support nor oppose, 2% said they somewhat oppose, and 3% said they strongly oppose.
Improving pedestrian crossing at the junction between East Surrey Street and Upper Arundel Street: 41% said they strongly support, 32% said they somewhat support, 24% said they neither support nor oppose, 2% said they somewhat oppose, and 3% said they strongly oppose.
Adding a ‘build out’ and uncontrolled crossing on Greetham Street next to the railway bridge: 35% said they strongly support, 29% said they somewhat support, 26% said they neither support nor oppose, 4% said they somewhat oppose, and 6% said they strongly oppose.
Adding an uncontrolled crossing at Isambard Brunel Road junction with Dugald Drummond Street: 35% said they strongly support, 31% said they somewhat support, 27% said they neither support nor oppose, 3% said they somewhat oppose, and 4% said they strongly oppose.
Adding an uncontrolled crossing at George House junction with Somers Road: 33% said they strongly support, 29% said they somewhat support, 30% said they neither support nor oppose, 3% said they somewhat oppose, and 4% said they strongly oppose. Adding an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing at the junction between Sydenham Terrace and Canal Walk: 32% said they strongly support, 32% said they somewhat support, 30% said they neither support nor oppose, 3% said they somewhat oppose, and 3% said they strongly oppose