SEHRT Spur Road: support of proposed changes

Summary

• 54% of respondents who frequently travel through Spur Road roundabout by any transport method support the bus priority measures proposal (54%); bus users more strongly support (73%)
• Frequent travellers by bicycle (67%) show the most support for replacing the existing pedestrian subway with a more accessible crossing whilst pedestrians and car drivers report the most opposition (31% and 30% opposing respectively)
• All cohorts of frequent travellers support the proposal to revise the line markings approaching the roundabout. Car or van passengers (86%) and drivers (84%) support the most
• Frequent cyclists show the most support for the proposal of improving the footpath and cycle lane at Southampton Road, with over three quarters strongly supporting it (78%)

An asterisk (*) indicates a very small base size, caution should be taken when interpreting the results

This chart shows that in terms of supporting the proposal of ‘bus priority measures at Sundridge Gate and Spur Road’. With Frequent travellers (via all modes of transport) – 24% strongly support it, 30% somewhat support it, 23% neither support nor oppose it, 11% somewhat oppose it and 12% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car drivers – 17% strongly support it, 32% somewhat support it, 26% neither support nor oppose it, 12% somewhat oppose it and 12% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car passengers – 22% strongly support it, 35% somewhat support it, 23% neither support nor oppose it, 5% somewhat oppose it and 15% strongly oppose it. With Frequent travellers by foot – 33% strongly support it, 29% somewhat support it, 14% neither support nor oppose it, 7% somewhat oppose it and 17% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bicycle travellers – 56% strongly support it, 22% somewhat support it, 11% neither support nor oppose it, 6% somewhat oppose it and 6% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bus travellers – 73% strongly support it, 14% somewhat support it, 9% neither support nor oppose it and 5% strongly oppose it.

Base: Frequent travellers (223) | Frequently by bus (22*) (*Caution small base) | Frequently by bicycle (18*)  | Frequent by foot (42) | Frequent car passengers (65) | Frequent car drivers (190)

(Frequent travellers are respondents traveling by a mode of transport at least twice a week)

This chart shows that in terms of supporting the proposal of ‘replace the existing pedestrian subway with a more accessible crossing’. With Frequent travellers (all modes of transport) – 32% strongly support it, 22% somewhat support it, 16% neither support nor oppose it, 13% somewhat oppose it and 17% strongly oppose it
With Frequent car drivers – 29% strongly support it, 23% somewhat support it, 18% neither support nor oppose it, 14% somewhat oppose it and 16% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car passengers – 42% strongly support it, 25% somewhat support it, 11% neither support nor oppose it, 8% somewhat oppose it and 15% strongly oppose it. With Frequent travellers by foot – 43% strongly support it, 19% somewhat support it, 7% neither support nor oppose it, 10% somewhat oppose it and 21% strongly oppose it
With Frequent bicycle travellers – 56% strongly support it, 11% somewhat support it, 6% neither support nor oppose it, 6% somewhat oppose it and 22% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bus travellers – 41% strongly support it, 23% somewhat support it, 9% neither support nor oppose it, 9% somewhat oppose it and 18% strongly oppose it.

Base: Frequent travellers (222) | Frequent car drivers (189) | Frequent car passengers (65) | Frequently by foot (42) | Frequently by bicycle (18*) | Frequently by bus (22*) *Caution small base

This chart shows that in terms of supporting the proposal of ‘revise the line markings approaching the roundabout to better manage the traffic flow and improve safety’. With Frequent travellers (all modes of transport) – 60% strongly support it, 22% somewhat support it, 9% neither support nor oppose it, 5% somewhat oppose it and 4% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car drivers – 61% strongly support it, 23% somewhat support it, 9% neither support nor oppose it, 4% somewhat oppose it and 4% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car passengers – 68% strongly support it, 18% somewhat support it, 6% neither support nor oppose it, 5% somewhat oppose it and 3% strongly oppose it. With Frequent travellers by foot – 45% strongly support it, 26% somewhat support it, 12% neither support nor oppose it, 10% somewhat oppose it and 7% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bicycle travellers – 56% strongly support it, 17% somewhat support it, 6% neither support nor oppose it, 11% somewhat oppose it and 11% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bus travellers – 59% strongly support it, 23% somewhat support it, 5% neither support nor oppose it, 5% somewhat oppose it and 9% strongly oppose it.

Base: Frequent travellers (223) | Frequent car drivers (190) | Frequent car passengers (65) | Frequently by foot (42) | Frequently by bicycle (18*) | Frequently by bus (22*) *Caution small base

This chart shows that in terms of supporting the proposal of ‘improve the footpath and cycle lane at Southampton Road’. With Frequent travellers (all modes of transport) – 41% strongly support it, 30% somewhat support it, 16% neither support nor oppose it, 6% somewhat oppose it and 7% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car drivers – 39% strongly support it, 31% somewhat support it, 17% neither support nor oppose it, 6% somewhat oppose it and 8% strongly oppose it. With Frequent car passengers – 49% strongly support it, 23% somewhat support it, 15% neither support nor oppose, 5% somewhat oppose it and 8% strongly oppose it. With Frequent travellers by foot – 45% strongly support it, 26% somewhat support it, 10% neither support nor oppose it, 12% somewhat oppose it and 7% strongly oppose it. With Frequent bicycle travellers – 78% strongly support it, 11% somewhat support it, 6% neither support nor oppose it and 6% somewhat oppose it. With Frequent bus travellers – 45% strongly support it, 32% somewhat support it, 18% neither support nor oppose it and 5% strongly oppose it.

Base: Frequent travellers (223) | Frequent car drivers (190) | Frequent car passengers (65) | Frequently by foot (42) | Frequently by bicycle (18*) | Frequently by bus (22*) *Caution small base