Improvements and priorities

• Over three-quarters of respondents agree that all the suggested priorities are the correct actions to focus on
• There is very low level of disagreement with any of the suggestions (12% or less)
• Working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents is the top action to prioritise for 29% of respondents
• Around a fifth of respondents choose improving consultation methods, diversity monitoring and community events as their top choice
• Holding an annual city EDI meeting is top choice for 8% of respondents

This chart shows that:
67% of respondents strongly agree that the council could prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents
21% of respondents somewhat agree that the council could prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents
10% of respondents neither agree nor disagree that the council could prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents
1% of respondents somewhat disagree that the council could prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents
1% of respondents strongly disagree that the council could prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents
58% of respondents strongly agree that the council could prioritise improving their consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say
32% of respondents somewhat agree that the council could prioritise improving their consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say
6% of respondents neither agree nor disagree that the council could prioritise improving their consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say
2% of respondents somewhat disagree that the council could prioritise improving their consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say
1% of respondents strongly disagree that the council could prioritise improving their consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say
57% of respondents strongly agree that the council could prioritise creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community
28% of respondents somewhat agree that the council could prioritise creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community
12% of respondents neither agree nor disagree that the council could prioritise creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community
2% of respondents somewhat disagree that the council could prioritise creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community
1% of respondents strongly disagree that the council could prioritise creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community
50% of respondents strongly agree that the council could prioritise holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress
26% of respondents somewhat agree that the council could prioritise holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress
13% of respondents neither agree nor disagree that the council could prioritise holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress
7% of respondents somewhat disagree that the council could prioritise holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress
5% of respondents strongly disagree that the council could prioritise holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress
43% of respondents strongly agree that the council could prioritise setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities
36% of respondents somewhat agree that the council could prioritise setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities
11% of respondents neither agree nor disagree that the council could prioritise setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities
6% of respondents somewhat disagree that the council could prioritise setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities
4% of respondents strongly disagree that the council could prioritise setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities

This chart shows that:
29% of respondents would pick prioritise working with the police to understand tensions, harassment and hate crime incidents as their top priority
22% of respondents would pick improving consultation methods so all groups in the community have their say as their top priority
20% of respondents would pick setting up regular diversity monitoring across all council-run services and facilities to identify gaps and address inequalities as their top priority
20% of respondents would pick creating and delivering events which foster good relations with all sections of the community as their top priority
8% of respondents would pick holding an annual city equality, diversity and inclusion meeting with community leaders, voluntary organisations and businesses to report progress as their top priority