Search
Generic filters
Summary
  • 60% of respondents agree with the policies under Objective 1 while 20% hold a neutral view of these policies
  • 20% of respondents disagree with the policies under Objective 1
  • The largest proportion of respondents who disagree with policies under Objective 1 (11%) disagree with Policy 5 as they feel it would create unfair additional costs for businesses, which could drive business out of the city – respondents also believe that this policy would cause motorists to suffer
  • The second largest proportion of respondents who disagree with policies under Objective 1 (10%) disagree with Policy 3 – ‘Maintain the residents’ parking permit system while encouraging fewer, cleaner vehicles and supporting car clubs’

For full wording of the policies see the table below.

Agreement with Objective 1

Base: Objective 1 – Delivering cleaner air (814)

The following chart shows the level of agreement that respondents have with policies under objective 1 and then the percentage of respondents who disagree with each policy under the ‘delivering cleaner air’ objective. 60% of respondents agree, 20% hold a neutral view and 20% disagree with policies under objective 1 – ‘delivering cleaner air’. Of those respondents who disagree with polices under objective 1, 11% of respondents disagree with “Policy 5: Explore private non-residential parking restrictions to encourage mode shift and help pay for improved walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure”. 10% disagree with “Policy 3: Maintain the residents’ parking permit system while encouraging fewer, cleaner vehicles and supporting car clubs”. 8% disagree with “Policy 6: Deliver residential and business behaviour change initiatives to encourage people to walk, cycle and use public transport”. 8% disagree with “Policy 1: Implement a government-directed city centre Clean Air Zone in 2021”. 6% disagree with “Policy 4: Expand the Portsmouth park and ride to reduce pollution and congestion in the city centre”. 5% disagree with “Policy 2: Support infrastructure for alternative fuelled vehicles”. 1% of respondents disagree with none of the policies.

Objective 1: Respondents reasons for disagreeing with each policy

PoliciesReasonsBase
Policy 1: Implement a government-directed

city centre Clean Air Zone in 2021
It needs to cover the whole of the island

It's unnecessary

It could be damaging for businesses in Portsmouth

57
Policy 2: Support infrastructure for alternative

fuelled vehicles
It's costly

Electric cars are not the answer

There's no space in Portsmouth for the amount of charging points required

31
Policy 3: Maintain the residents’ parking permit system while encouraging fewer, cleaner vehicles

and supporting car clubs
This shifts problems to other areas

Car clubs are impracticable for some

Covid-19 concerns

Residents are still unable to park

77
Policy 4: Expand the Portsmouth park and ride

to reduce pollution and congestion in the city centre
Not many people in the City use the Park and Ride

This only helps people outside of the City

Create a park and train instead

40
Policy 5: Explore private non-residential parking restrictions to encourage mode shift and help pay

for improved walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure
Unfair additional cost for businesses

This will drive business out of the City

Motorists will suffer

79
Policy 6: Deliver residential and business behaviour change initiatives to encourage people

to walk, cycle and use public transport
Behaviour change is difficult

It's not practical for some

58