Missing from the draft objectives

• Overall, much smaller proportions of respondents feel that something is missing from the draft objectives
• From an age and sex perspective, only those aged 35-44 and 55-74, and males think something is missing
• The highest proportion of respondents feel a more bold/ progressive, environmentally considered approach is missing from the draft objectives (38%)
• 19% of respondents who feel something is missing from the draft objectives are generally not in support of EVs
• 13% each feel a consideration of the cost, such as the affordability of EVs and cost to non-users, is missing from the draft objectives, as well as a clear and structured approach

This chart shows the proportion of respondents who think something is missing from the draft objectives:
3% of the total sample.
0% of those aged 25-34, 4% of those aged 35-44, 0% of those aged 45-54, 4% of those aged 55-64, 5% of those aged 65-74, and 0% of those aged 75 and over.
4% of males and 0% of females.
1% of those whose main vehicle is electric, 3% of those whose main vehicle is not electric, and 8% of those who do not have regular use of a motor vehicle.
3% of those in PO1, 2% of those in PO2, 4% of those in PO3, 1% of those in PO4, 3% of those in PO5, and 4% of those in PO6.
4% of those with a disability and 3% of those without a disability.