- The most frequent comment made by respondents about the draft objectives relates to charging points for EVs (12%), such as the city needing more, and the need for them to be cheap, reliable, and in key locations
- 6% of respondents are not sure if EVs are the environmental future, feel that the draft objectives need to be more proactive, express general agreement with the strategy/ EVs, or express the need to consider the affordability and feasibility for residents
Draft objectives: further comments
Summary
Do you have any (other) comments to make about the draft objectives?
Base: Total sample (485)
| wdt_ID | Key themes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charging points e.g. need more, to be cheap, reliable, in key locations, provisions for both on-street and off-street, easy payment through one app | 12 |
| 2 | Not sure if EVs are the environmental future | 6 |
| 3 | Need to be more proactive e.g. infrastructure in place first, integrate with other transport options | 6 |
| 4 | General agreement with strategy/ EVs | 6 |
| 5 | Need to consider affordability and feasibility for residents | 6 |
| 6 | Parking concerns | 5 |
| 10 | Unsure the council will be able to provide level of infrastructure needed | 4 |
| 11 | Ensure the impact is minimal to residents e.g. pavements and accessibility | 2 |
| 12 | Concern about cost to the council/ public | 1 |
| 13 | Not in support of strategy/ timeline | 1 |
| 14 | Other e.g. still issues with traffic jams, prioritise active travel | 5 |
| 15 | No relevant comment / no comment | 62 |
