Explore the demand in all PCC owned car parks to provide charging infrastructure at key destinations across the city.
Disagreement with policy D
Summary
- Disagreement levels with policy D (explore the demand in all PCC owned car parks to provide charging infrastructure at key destinations across the city) are slightly higher amongst those aged 25-34 and 65+, males, those whose main vehicle is not an EV or do not have regular use of a motor vehicle, residents in PO1 and PO3, and those with a disability
- The main reason respondents disagree with policy D is because they feel that the council should not be promoting the use of EV (35%)
- 12% each are concerned about the cost to the council/ public or are concerned about the impact of this policy on parking in the city
- Respondents are also unsure about how much demand there will be from visitors for this charging infrastructure (9%)
Who disagrees with policy D?
Base: (top to bottom) | Total sample: 415 | Age: 23*, 53, 67, 107, 88, 28* | Sex: 227, 135 | EV ownership: 88, 272, 37 | Postcode: 31, 61, 47, 99, 65, 48 | Disability: 68, 292 | *Caution small base
This chart shows the proportion of respondents who disagree with policy D (Explore the demand in all PCC owned car parks to provide charging infrastructure at key destinations across the city):
8% of the total sample.
9% of those aged 25-34, 4% of those aged 35-44, 6% of those aged 45-54, 7% of those aged 55-64, 10% of those aged 65-74, and 11% of those aged 75 and over.
9% of males and 3% of females.
3% of those whose main vehicle is electric, 10% of those whose main vehicle is not electric and 11% of those who do not have regular use of a motor vehicle.
10% of those in PO1, 8% of those in PO2, 13% of those in PO3, 8% of those in PO4, 6% of those in PO5, and 4% of those in PO6.
13% of those with a disability and 6% of those without a disability.
Why do you disagree with policy D?
Base: Respondents who disagree with policy D (34)
| wdt_ID | Key themes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Should not be promoting use of EVs | 35 |
| 2 | Cost to the council/ public | 12 |
| 3 | Concerned about impact on parking | 12 |
| 4 | Unsure about how much demand there will be from visitors | 9 |
| 5 | Unsure about ability to provide the infrastructure to support this | 6 |
| 6 | Concern about the cost of EVs, including charging | 6 |
| 10 | How many will be provided? | 6 |
| 12 | Need to be more proactive | 3 |
| 13 | Other e.g. security issues like vandalism, feel the council’s policies will put off visitors driving to the city | 6 |
| 14 | No relevant comment / no comment | 15 |