Disagreement with policy A

To continue to deliver the On-Street Residential Chargepoint Scheme  to meet resident demand initially, through low power overnight charging via lamp column infrastructure, then look to strategically expand on-street infrastructure based on geographical spread in the city.

• Disagreement levels with policy A (to continue to deliver the On-Street Residential Chargepoint Scheme) are highest amongst those aged 65+, males, respondents whose main vehicle is not an EV or do not have regular use of a motor vehicle, and those living in PO2
• The main reason respondents disagree with policy A is feeling there is no room for the charge points/ existing parking concerns in Portsmouth (37%)
• 15% of respondents also express uncertainty about the council’s ability to provide this infrastructure, whilst 14% feel that the demand will not be there/ EVs are not affordable or feasible for all residents

This chart shows the proportion of respondents who disagree with policy A: To continue to deliver the On-Street Residential Chargepoint Scheme to meet resident demand initially, through low power overnight charging via lamp column infrastructure, then look to strategically expand on-street infrastructure based on geographical spread in the city:
18% of the total sample.
17% of those aged 25-34, 8% of those aged 35-44, 10% of those aged 45-54, 16% of those aged 55-64, 23% of those aged 65-74, and 21% of those aged 75 and over.
18% of males and 10% of females.
3% of those whose main vehicle is electric, 22% of those whose main vehicle is not electric, and 22% of those who do not have regular use of a motor vehicle disagree.
13% of those in PO1, 33% of those in PO2, 21% of those in PO3, 16% of those in PO4, 11% of those in PO5, and 6% of those in PO6.
18% of those with a disability and 15% of those without a disability.