Search
Generic filters

Summary

  • Not unexpectedly, accessibility of bus stops and the location of bus stops is rated slightly lower by those with a disability or other accessibility issue than those who do not
  • Note, even for these user groups only small proportions of respondents rate accessibility or location poorly (≤ 12%)

*Other accessibility issue is defined as those using a wheelchair, mobility scooter, walking aid, carrying a pushchair or carrying a large object

How would you rate the accessibility of bus stops in Portsmouth?

Base: Total sample (1,109) | Disability: 252 | Other accessibility issue*: 141 | No disability: 781

This chart shows that: 15% of the total sample rate the accessibility of bus stops as very good, 50% as good, 28% as fair, 5% as poor, and 2% as very poor.
Of those with a disability, 14% rate the accessibility of bus stops as very good, 42% as good, 33% as fair, 6% as poor, and 5% as very poor.
Of those with a different accessibility issue, 11% rate the accessibility of bus stops as very good, 45% as good, 31% as fair, 7% as poor, and 5% as very poor.
Of those with no disability, 15% rate the accessibility of bus stops as very good, 53% as good, 27% as fair, 4% as poor, and 1% as very poor.

How would you rate the location of bus stops in Portsmouth?

Base: Total sample (1,110) | Disability: 254 | Other accessibility issue*: 140 | No disability: 808

This chart shows that 11% of the total sample rate the location of bus stops as very good, 46% as good, 34% as fair, 6% as poor, and 2% as very poor.
Of those with a disability, 12% rate the location of bus stops as very good, 37% as good, 39% as fair, 8% as poor, and 4% as very poor.
Of those with a different accessibility issue, 10% rate the location of bus stops as very good, 44% as good, 35% as fair, 7% as poor, and 4% as very poor.
Of those with no disability, 11% rate the location of bus stops as very good, 49% as good, 32% as fair, 6% as poor, and 2% as very poor.